4 ms·
You're attacking a strawman. The person you're replying to didn't claim that rich people's children are more meritorious simply by birth. If we assume good fait
by bigstrat2003 3y ago
You're attacking a strawman. The person you're replying to didn't claim that rich people's children are more meritorious simply by birth. If we assume good faith (which we should), the other poster would similarly be opposed to nepotism which grants unfair advantages.
- coliveira 3y agoI'm not countering the poster's idea, I'm just pointing out that capitalism is also incompatible with meritocracy for the reasons that I mentioned.