2 ms·
I just rewatched the new Dune, and disagree with my previous assessment. I enjoyed the movie a lot more the second time around. Perhaps I had preconceived noti
by antihipocrat 3y ago
I just rewatched the new Dune, and disagree with my previous assessment. I enjoyed the movie a lot more the second time around.
Perhaps I had preconceived notions the first time (I did watch Lynch's version immediately prior). Perhaps also as others have mentioned I didn't catch all the dialogue as it is quieter than the score in many sections, this time I had the subtitles on.
The cinematography is great, there are way more wide context shots than I remembered. I also felt the magic was there and there is a dreamlike quality during Paul's spice vision scenes. I'm honestly not sure why I didn't enjoy it the first time.
If you are like I was and ambivalent about the sequel, maybe give this movie another go. I've changed my mind and now looking forward to seeing part 2.
- Nursie 3y agoI got more frustrated with it on a second watch, about how shallow the characters and their relationships were, and about how the blandness and faded colour choices of a lot of the visuals seemed like a deliberate reaction against the richness and almost pantomime nature of the Lynch version. I came away thinking they got the ornithopters right but little else.
- antihipocrat 3y agoThat still rings true to me, the interpersonal relationships are lacking emotion.. It's as if all human relations and events are being told from a Bene Gesserit perspective, and perhaps this was intentional. If intentional then it would be a good character arc for Paul to reject this in the second movie.. and then become dispassionate in his own way again in the third