3 ms·
And even this seems to me to be not quite right. There was a talk, Marissa Meyer gave on Velocity '09: http://blip.tv/oreilly-velocity-conference/velocity-09-m
by sdoering 15y ago
And even this seems to me to be not quite right. There was a talk, Marissa Meyer gave on Velocity '09:
http://blip.tv/oreilly-velocity-conference/velocity-09-marissa-mayer-in-search-of-a-better-faster-stronger-web-2305322 http://blip.tv/oreilly-velocity-conference/velocity-09-maris...
Just watch from 1:00 to 2:00 -> One Minute will answer the question.
Here she tells the story, how the first Google Design came to live. It is quite interesting. It seems, that minimalism wasn't a rational choice and that it came to stay only, because the data proofed it to be the right lucky choice.
I can understand, that the minimalistic homepage was a point of pride. I would be proud, to minify the homepage of the company I work for.
- OpinKerfiBjarni 15y agoYeah, it's really the last point that I was making - that it was a point of pride to keep it small, even after there was all sorts of "stuff" that could be added to it. The fact that it was small to begin with was probably a combination of luck and intuition.
- seldo 15y ago> The fact that it was small to begin with was probably a combination of luck and intuition. Which was the point I was making.