3 ms·
It seems like you're describing a common situation where orgs that didn't function well before WFH, continued not to work well. The sign was that suddenly peop
by tomohawk 3y ago
It seems like you're describing a common situation where orgs that didn't function well before WFH, continued not to work well. The sign was that suddenly people were able to be productive on certain things when WFH. The org was out of balance before WFH, and is now out of balance after. That's an org thing, not a WFH thing.
Our experience with software development team was WFH actually helped with the larger picture. It allowed people to be more strategic and intentional about decisions, instead of trying to do that in the daily tilt-a-whirl that is the office.