3 ms·
It's probably not lithium. And despite the initially valid-seeming high hopes for their amazing scholarship, currently it looks that they are too crackpot-y :/
by pas 3y ago
It's probably not lithium.
And despite the initially valid-seeming high hopes for their amazing scholarship, currently it looks that they are too crackpot-y :/
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/7iAABhWpcGeP5e6SB/it-s-probably-not-lithium https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/7iAABhWpcGeP5e6SB/it-s-proba...
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NRrbJJWnaSorrqvtZ/on-not-getting-contaminated-by-the-wrong-obesity-ideas https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NRrbJJWnaSorrqvtZ/on-not-get...
- pas 3y agoOut of the edit window, but this seems like a nice summary of the current understanding of the hypothesis: https://manifold.markets/LarsDoucet/will-the-contaminant-hypothesis-of-f27836a908da https://manifold.markets/LarsDoucet/will-the-contaminant-hyp... Will the contaminant hypothesis of modern obesity be judged true by expert consensus before 2032? 8% yes 92% no