When someone says "AGI" what does that actually mean to you today? Every time I talk with others about this it feels like we have wildly different interpretatio

When someone says "AGI" what does that actually mean to you today? Every time I talk with others about this it feels like we have wildly different interpretations and expectations. Similar to "cloud native", "crypto", et. al. For me, the most basic level of "AGI" is: I can provide a human instruction and the intelligence will iteratively work through a known problem space with known tools until it reaches a satisfactory outcome, or realizes it is unable to complete the task with an explanation regarding why. How this outcome is achieved is not really relevant to me. The effect on the business is all that really matters. The LLM doesn't seem like the important part anymore. We figured out a pretty damn good hammer. It bangs those nails in clean pretty much one swing every time. We need to stop focusing on the hammer and begin focusing on the framing.