“closed-source” AI applications ...—where the system’s software is securely held by its maker and a limited set of vetted partners. ... while keeping the under

“closed-source” AI applications ...—where the system’s software is securely held by its maker and a limited set of vetted partners. ... while keeping the underlying software secure. ... rapid and uncontrolled release of powerful unsecured ... "secure, vetted, dangerous unsecured systems, blah, blah, blah." This is the worst kind of propaganda, supporting corporate AI companies, who in any case can hardly be trusted to guide AI in a direction to benefit all of society. And honestly, what is the danger? That AI can spew toxic and misleading content? We certainly don't need AI for that! Open-source AI may or may not be more 'dangerous' than corporate AI, but it is essential for society that AI is open.