I think it's proper criticism, since even the article as a whole doesn't actually say anything we didn't already know. "M1 might (will) be inferior to M2 and M

I think it's proper criticism, since even the article as a whole doesn't actually say anything we didn't already know. "M1 might (will) be inferior to M2 and M3 for 'AI' workloads." No shit Sherlock, hardware obsolescence in a nutshell. The least the article could then do is explain itself for unenlightened readers.