Not an Australian. The article seems to be very pro-government, so glosses over all the risks to schemes like this; even touting: companies and other governmen

Not an Australian. The article seems to be very pro-government, so glosses over all the risks to schemes like this; even touting: companies and other governments already have all your data so this is fine, and not even questioning the $800m price tag (which will at least triple if the Australian gov is as incompetent as mine). Need a more balanced, objective, article.