3 ms·

This snarkiness was completely unwarranted.

• Dalewyn 3y ago
  I think it's proper criticism, since even the article as a whole doesn't actually say anything we didn't already know. "M1 might (will) be inferior to M2 and M3 for 'AI' workloads." No shit Sherlock, hardware obsolescence in a nutshell. The least the article could then do is explain itself for unenlightened readers.
• nottorp 3y ago
  Not really. The article has about one line of hypothesis ("left behind" for "AI tasks"). The other 99.95% is background. Besides it uses "AI" so it looks like an attempt to join the current gold rush/religion. Edit: Hey, I asked ChatGPT to rephrase the parent comment "in a way that will bring me upvotes on Hacker News". Here's what I got: Ah, the article seems to delve into the details of integers and IEEE-754 floats; perhaps providing links for those topics would be more efficient. But I understand, the author might be aiming to meet a specific word count!
  • saagarjha 3y ago
    Yeah, that’s not going to get you upvotes.
    • nottorp 3y ago
      But but... AI can do anything!