I don't see why; the recommendations in the article are generic regulatory-capture plays, and this person has not really demonstrated a specific mastery of AI.

I don't see why; the recommendations in the article are generic regulatory-capture plays, and this person has not really demonstrated a specific mastery of AI. Other versions of his resume list him as the Research Manager for "Social Impact" and almost all of his publications are for commercial media. In other words, writing these articles is basically his job. This is in essence a sociologist's take on AI, which is why it doesn't bother to define "AI", demands international treaties which would violate American constitutional rights, and contains outright nonsense like "educating all suppliers of custom nucleic acids...about best practices" (as though someone in that business doesn't already know).