If one founder is getting roasted for inappropriate public display, the other (who actually started the whole thing publicly) needs to be also. Let's be consist

If one founder is getting roasted for inappropriate public display, the other (who actually started the whole thing publicly) needs to be also. Let's be consistent. Some of the information about this incident highlights a breach of information ethics, and the rest is all accusation from people who don't know the internal company data access protocols. Founders need investors, and investors want access to shares, pricing, and valuation info. The problem getting completely left out of all discussion about this, is that the usage of this data (which should be ethical and signed off on certainly) to enable private market liquidity MOST benefits the employees. Carta killing this business is a huge setback to financial improvement for startup employees. But you know, as long as founders feel cozy it's all good.