4 ms·
Why not limit AI training to scientific subjects and leave the arts to humans?
by someoldgit 3y ago
Why not limit AI training to scientific subjects and leave the arts to humans?
- abathologist 3y ago$$$$$
- phowat 3y agoBecause we're aiming for AGI
- CamperBob2 3y agoWe wouldn't be humans if we did that. Or artists, for that matter.
- pona-a 3y agoOr particularly good scientists, unless blindly (over)fitting models is what constitutes science.
- kolinko 3y agoIt doesn't work like that, not with text. If you make a text model smart enough it will be able to generate whatever you want.
- HKH2 3y agoMaybe because machine art encourages humans to think more laterally? Have you seen how tired art has become? It's mostly a cynical scheme to make or launder money. AI can force artists to actually take risks to outdo the mediocrity of generic art.
- dTal 3y agoBecause art is less rigorous and therefore lower hanging fruit.
- d3w4s9 3y agoWhat else do you want to leave out? It is an endless list, and nobody out there will actually enforce it -- even if someone follows that voluntarily, another company is going to ignore it.