3 ms·
It's not even a big loss in clean energy. Oregon solar has been on a roll, their total solar capacity graph[1] shows a very hockey stick-shaped line for the pas
by mullingitover 3y ago
It's not even a big loss in clean energy. Oregon solar has been on a roll, their total solar capacity graph[1] shows a very hockey stick-shaped line for the past few years with no sign of letting up. I would wager the state will add more solar generation capacity than it lost from this dam in a matter of months if the trend (the graph ends in 2021) has held up. The eastern half the state is high desert and has plenty of sun.
[1] https://www.oregon.gov/energy/energy-oregon/Pages/Oregon-Solar-Dashboard.aspx https://www.oregon.gov/energy/energy-oregon/Pages/Oregon-Sol...
- LargeTomato 3y agoJust for my own reference, is transferring power from Eastern Oregon to Western Oregon a reasonably efficient thing to do? How much power is lost when we move it across an area the size of Oregon?
- mjevans 3y agoLess of a loss than selling energy from Texas to California. Edit: Much more information generally: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission#Losses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission#Lo... "For example, a 100 mi (160 km) span at 765 kV carrying 1000 MW of power can have losses of 0.5% to 1.1%. A 345 kV line carrying the same load across the same distance has losses of 4.2%."
- margalabargala 3y agoWikipedia tells me that high voltage lines transmitting 1GW at normal grid voltages will have losses of about 1% over a distance of 100 miles, which is honestly quite a lot. That's 100kW per mile. Oregon is only a couple hundred miles across, so it's feasible, but with more losses than I thought when I looked it up to answer you.
- Arrath 3y agoThere's also a goodly quantity of wind generation capacity in/along the Columbia gorge.
- philwelch 3y agoYes but dams still work at night. In fact you can use them to solve that energy storage problem the solar industry keeps handwaving about.