3 ms·
Except this reason was most likely a fabrication due to the fact that they never communicated performance issues in the past. Cloudflare lied. It’s plain and s
by aaomidi 3y ago
Except this reason was most likely a fabrication due to the fact that they never communicated performance issues in the past.
Cloudflare lied. It’s plain and simple.
- epolanski 3y agoOr maybe they did and she didn't tell in the TikToks? Don't believe everything you see on the internet. Be smarter than that, form opinions based on as many facts as possible, not only partial, biased, information.
- aaomidi 3y agoI have more reason to believe this person than I do cloudflare.
- epolanski 3y agoPractice being skeptical.
- aaomidi 3y agoYou should probably do the same thing. Given the information, and given what I know about Cloudflare’s internals and how they have behaved, and given how Matthew Prince has been in the past. It is unreasonable to think Cloudflare is in the right here.
- westpfelia 3y agoRight? I mean who is more likely to be shady and do crooked things? Some person or a business? Can anyone even name a single time when a company has fired someone without real cause and lied? /S
- valval 3y agoCompanies are made of individuals, and individuals can be shady and crooked. In a vacuum, it’s probably somewhat as likely that the person getting fired and the company doing the firing are scumbags. I’d personally argue that companies have more of a reputation to uphold for profitability reasons, and will therefore be incentivised to act less scummy than individuals. In this case, the company has nothing to gain no matter how they sever the contract. They’re simply getting rid of an employee who was either costing them money, or getting rid of many employees at a time to navigate a difficult economic situation. The person making the TikTok on the other hand has a lot to gain from making a controversial and attention-grabbing spectacle out of this.