3 ms·
You'd have to more thoroughly define "successful." You'd also have to explain why you think the lack of one would prove any point.
by akira2501 3y ago
You'd have to more thoroughly define "successful." You'd also have to explain why you think the lack of one would prove any point.
- autoexec 3y agoIt's not that the lack of one proves it's impossible, but if one existed it'd sure be evidence that government isn't a requirement. As for "successful" I suppose that is very much subjective. Is there one you'd consider to be successful?