Re: "unsupported by the scientific literature" Einstein received the same treatment before relativity was widely accepted. In medicine the man who started the

Re: "unsupported by the scientific literature" Einstein received the same treatment before relativity was widely accepted. In medicine the man who started the practice of cleaning hands before surgeries and childbirth, was essentially murdered for his preposterous practices: "You'd think everyone would be thrilled. Semmelweis had solved the problem! But they weren't thrilled. For one thing, doctors were upset because Semmelweis' hypothesis made it look like they were the ones giving childbed fever to the women. ... The sad end to the story is that Semmelweis was probably beaten in the asylum and eventually died of sepsis". - https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/01/12/375663920/the-doctor-who-championed-hand-washing-and-saved-women-s-lives https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/01/12/3756639... And paraphrasing Dr. Willie Soon, from the recent Tucker Carlson interview - found here - Soon says it only 1 takes scientist to be right - so the "unsupported by scientific literature" should hold little weight as you presented it at some kind of proof point; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7IdLzxzINw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7IdLzxzINw All you're doing here is citing, to make it appear legitimate, what essentially is high level ad hominem - as you're not going into any specifics to argue a point, and where I doubt your sources even attempt to counter argue all of the relevant arguments that Soon put forward. You're just parroting propaganda talking points, literally copy/pasting them from a known corrupted-manipulated source: "In a February 2021 interview with Fox News, Sanger stated that Wikipedia's 'ideological and religious bias is real and troubling, particularly in a resource that continues to be treated by many as an unbiased reference work'." - Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia.