3 ms·
Or, you could read what she writes, evaluate, do your own other research, and come to your own conclusion regarding the merits or lack thereof of any piece of c
by indigodaddy 3y ago
Or, you could read what she writes, evaluate, do your own other research, and come to your own conclusion regarding the merits or lack thereof of any piece of content.
- stillbourne 3y ago[flagged]
- not2b 3y agoPlease explain what you mean by "do your own other research". Searching with Google or scanning social media posts by people you agree with is not research. Someone with no education in the field isn't qualified to do research.
- mmcgaha 3y agoThe same people probably are not qualified to call her a quack either.
- nvm0n2 3y agoWell then you'll just have to believe Crockford, who has written many books and research papers about polar bears, and who has also been interviewed in the media as a polar bear expert many times.
- not2b 3y agoI haven't taken a position either way. Media interviews would not count with me. Research papers that survived peer review and were published would count.
- nvm0n2 3y agoClimate academics are on record as saying they manipulate peer review to reject valid science if it would weaken their "message", so that's not a good idea.
- 303uru 3y agoDYOR, the calling card of every agent of disinformation. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/03/opinion/dyor-do-your-own-research.html https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/03/opinion/dyor-do-your-own-...
- indigodaddy 3y agoSo weird, up until about 4-5 years ago (or whenever this insanity started), DYOR used to be called reading, but now it’s fully frowned upon and you are even shamed for doing so.