4 ms·

>The other poster wasn't participating in an argument with Matt Walsh. not required.

• operatingthetan 3y ago
  No argument, no fallacy. Logic 101 son.
  • Vicinity9635 3y ago
    Again, not required.
    • operatingthetan 3y ago
      >Gratuitous verbal abuse or "name-calling" is not on its own an example of the abusive argumentum ad hominem logical fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling Don't bother responding with another "no."
      • Vicinity9635 3y ago
        >Don't bother responding with another "no." Go fuck yourself. That better?
        • operatingthetan 3y ago
          At least you've dispensed with any possibility that you're discussing this in good faith. Your flagged comment was nonsensical, please spend some time reacquainting yourself with basic logic and the nuances of fallacies before embarrassing yourself again in the future.
          • Vicinity9635 3y ago
            Use a cactus.
            • operatingthetan 3y ago
              I'm uninterested in your deviant proclivities.