Without wanting to sidetrack the thread from the real issue of CISPA, I have to take issue with the quality of reporting. "Many have found the bill to be troub

Without wanting to sidetrack the thread from the real issue of CISPA, I have to take issue with the quality of reporting. "Many have found the bill to be troublesome, given that, in their estimation, its language was too broad to be safe. Also that the government could use the mandates and powers contained therein in ways that would be antithetical to privacy, and even in the cause of cyber security, could be too intrusive." In their estimation, powers contained therein, antithetical. What happened to plain language? "The language of the bill is too broad. It gives the government powers to intrude on the privacy of individuals. Even in the context of security legislation these powers are too intrusive."