> The people who run the SRO have an interest in perpetuating their organization, so they if anything have an incentive to be stricter than the government would

> The people who run the SRO have an interest in perpetuating their organization, so they if anything have an incentive to be stricter than the government would Except if the "people who run the SRO" are in fact employees of the very company they're supposed to be regulating... ? Then they surely have an even greater incentive to keep quiet in order to keep their jobs?