4 ms·
false
by Vicinity9635 3y ago
false
- operatingthetan 3y agofalse
- Vicinity9635 3y agoNo. Ad hominem literaly means "to the man". Attacking the speaker instead of the substance of what they said is a textbook ad hominem. You just don't like what he said because it's true.
- operatingthetan 3y agoThe other poster wasn't participating in an argument with Matt Walsh. You don't seem to understand the basics of logic. >You just don't like what he said because it's true. Cute following up with a fallacy of your own.
- Vicinity9635 3y ago>The other poster wasn't participating in an argument with Matt Walsh. not required.
- operatingthetan 3y agoNo argument, no fallacy. Logic 101 son.
- Vicinity9635 3y agoAgain, not required.
- operatingthetan 3y ago>Gratuitous verbal abuse or "name-calling" is not on its own an example of the abusive argumentum ad hominem logical fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling Don't bother responding with another "no."
- Vicinity9635 3y ago>Don't bother responding with another "no." Go fuck yourself. That better?
- operatingthetan 3y agoAt least you've dispensed with any possibility that you're discussing this in good faith. Your flagged comment was nonsensical, please spend some time reacquainting yourself with basic logic and the nuances of fallacies before embarrassing yourself again in the future.
- Vicinity9635 3y agoUse a cactus.
- operatingthetan 3y agoI'm uninterested in your deviant proclivities.
- Vicinity9635 3y ago>Cute following up with a fallacy of your own. oh please. HN's bias is exactly the same as reddit's. -4 for posting facts, and fallacies. It couldn't be more obvious.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- operatingthetan 3y agoNo, I'm just annoyed when someone bleats on about any fallacy and doesn't understand it. Your willingness to attack me in the same way is amusing though. 'You just think X' is silly. You know nothing.
- Vicinity9635 3y ago[dead]