> Of course it really just rolls the question uphill since you're now faced with 'Where did the Creator come from?'. Creationists aren't actually faced with th

> Of course it really just rolls the question uphill since you're now faced with 'Where did the Creator come from?'. Creationists aren't actually faced with that question - not Creationists who believe in a God who is eternal, anyway. Things without beginnings don't have origins. If you want to actually attack that belief, you need to either 1) show that God isn't eternal, or 2) show that eternal things are impossible. Or you have to do the hard work of 3) persuading them that a purely naturalistic process fits the available evidence better than a Creator does.