Ridiculous arguments are unfortunately common, and end up being part of politics and ultimately planning and decision-making. Natural vs. unnatural is irreleva

Ridiculous arguments are unfortunately common, and end up being part of politics and ultimately planning and decision-making. Natural vs. unnatural is irrelevant though. "Nature" is normally out to kill you for its own benefit and does not care if the planet or any of its lifeforms survives. What matters is our interests in preserving the world we know or improving it in our eyes, and picking the best option for that. The option that minimizes worldwide cancer development and doesn't screw up weather systems and various biomes would be the winner in that regard.