4 ms·
We just simply don't need that much brine for useful minerals -- it's a huge cost and you'll be left with massive piles of mostly useless salt. On one of my ha
by mikeyouse 3y ago
We just simply don't need that much brine for useful minerals -- it's a huge cost and you'll be left with massive piles of mostly useless salt.
On one of my hard drives, I've got an engineering / construction plan for a moderately sized intake + discharge for a small RO facility that would've passed muster in Australia, which has pretty reasonable environmental protections. Round numbers - the intake would have cost $25 million and the discharge more like $75 million. You need a massive structure to be able to emit that brine back into the environment in a way that doesn't just nuke the surrounding marine life. Huge pipes + check valves + cascading discharges, all either on the ocean floor if there aren't reefs and other sensitive areas or even worse from a cost perspective, tunneled out to a depth that can handle the amount of salt.
Seawater is ~35g/L of TDS - the author is talking about 5 million acre feet of desal - what's that, 20 million tons of salt annually?
- 0xNotMyAccount 3y agoThis is doable. Many coastal wastewater systems already have large pipes that extend miles to sea (1), and that's a rounding error compared to the many more miles of pipe routing sewage to the plant (2, pg A-3) (1) https://www.wateronline.com/doc/new-10-mile-long-sewage-tunnel-takes-treated-0001 https://www.wateronline.com/doc/new-10-mile-long-sewage-tunn... (2) https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/ploovol4_15.pdf https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/ploovol4_15.pdf Pipes tend to last a long time, in large part because it's relatively straightforward to manage the chemistry problem in the pipes.