Not sure I understand the objection. The research this article is about compared Wind vs Oil/Coal effects on birds. The title seems in line with the findings of

Not sure I understand the objection. The research this article is about compared Wind vs Oil/Coal effects on birds. The title seems in line with the findings of the research. > I find the question "what is a reliable, clean and affordable energy source?" much more relevant and productive. Seems to me like examining externalities of different energy sources is a part of the nuance of this question. Feels like you're being a bit of a hater.