3 ms·
You are sort of correct, nobody is saying that directly, but that is the result. The people who are concerned about wind turbines killing birds aren't offering
by mrweasel 3y ago
You are sort of correct, nobody is saying that directly, but that is the result.
The people who are concerned about wind turbines killing birds aren't offering any alternatives, that would be widely accepted, so the result is fossil fuel, because that's what we already have in place.
The anti-nuclear protests in the 60s and 70s also didn't want fossil fuels, but they also didn't understand that an increase in fossil fuel usage was the alternative, because it was the only one that made financial sense.
- pjc50 3y agoA lot of the anti-nuclear protests during the Cold War were against nuclear reactors because of nuclear weapons, which offered a much more immediate threat against the habitability of the earth.