I also wonder what responsibility the courts hold, seeing as folks were prosecuted and jailed on just IT evidence. I mean how in the world can you accuse and c

I also wonder what responsibility the courts hold, seeing as folks were prosecuted and jailed on just IT evidence. I mean how in the world can you accuse and convict someone of theft when there is zero evidence outside of the IT system. And how in the world was the IT system never scrutinized? I personally think the prosecutions were a sign of the times when people were still far too trusting of computer systems. I feel like these days, everyone would realize that there would be at least reasonable doubt as to the accuracy of the system, yet when these prosecutions were mostly taking place it feels like everyone just assumed the system was perfect.