3 ms·
Be sure to check the comments at the bottom. The authors of the papers in question respond to these criticisms. https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility
by maxbond 3y ago
Be sure to check the comments at the bottom. The authors of the papers in question respond to these criticisms.
https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility-crisis-reproducible/comment/46896739 https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility-crisis-repro...
https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility-crisis-reproducible/comment/46912311 https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility-crisis-repro...
https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility-crisis-reproducible/comment/46923532 https://www.argmin.net/p/is-the-reproducibility-crisis-repro...
- westhanover 3y agoWhich are completely ignored by the author of this article. Since the paper was picked up by some right leaning news outlets, unserious people feel the need to step in and start attacking the authors and the paper out of some dogmatic response.
- alexmolas 3y agoThe next post in the author's blog addresses the comments by the authors of the article [0]. Also, I don't think the arguments written in the post are "unserious", you might not like them but the author of the blog makes some interesting points against the original paper. [0]: https://www.argmin.net/p/arbitrage-in-data-exchange-rates https://www.argmin.net/p/arbitrage-in-data-exchange-rates
- westhanover 3y agoI would not call that addressing the comments, he merely acknowledged them and rehashed his same argument. The follow up was better left unposted.