3 ms·

I don't take the current "outrage" (wouldn't call it an outrage, but for the lack of other words) as "demands" as such. It's feedback from the users, that what

by diggan 3y ago

I don't take the current "outrage" (wouldn't call it an outrage, but for the lack of other words) as "demands" as such. It's feedback from the users, that what they're doing sucks. Then it's up to each user to decide if it's worth leaving the service for, or not. So people are essentially doing what you say they should do. The service changes, users give feedback, some might leave, some might not.

Xenoamorphous 3y ago
Why would YouTube "listen" to users with adblockers? They don't get ads, they don't pay for the premium version. They're a net loss to them (infra costs for nothing in exchange), they're better off without them so no incentive whatsoever to listen to them. And we should think about content creators too, where does the money they get paid for the views come from?