4 ms·
The article said they got banned from the Unity store several months ago and tried for months to reconcile the issue, and now they have come up with a solution
by tankenmate 3y ago
The article said they got banned from the Unity store several months ago and tried for months to reconcile the issue, and now they have come up with a solution for their customers in the wake of the banning. They even included the correspondence from Unity in their article, so barring Unity coming forward with evidence of double dealing on the part of VideoLAN I struggle to see how "this story has been dug/made up purely to sell a product".
Without some evidence your conclusion seems to be a hand wave.
- benj111 3y ago>"this story has been dug/made up purely to sell a product" No I said that's how it reads, Its why i suspect that people are saying it's click bait. My actual conclusion comes in the following paragraph. This is actually interesting from a marketing perspective. We all understand that marketing is there to sell us stuff. This is making us aware of a product, so it is in that sense at least, marketing. But then people don't like being 'sold to', at least they don't like noticing. This takes the form of 'marketing' that we don't recognise as such, but the disjoint puts it into an uncanny valley where it annoys people more than it objectively should. Is that un hand wavey enough?