> 'inside a Boeing' is not, legally speaking, the same as being 'inside Boeing'. Due to mens rea, it’s treated the same. However, if the subject can stick thei

> 'inside a Boeing' is not, legally speaking, the same as being 'inside Boeing'. Due to mens rea, it’s treated the same. However, if the subject can stick their arm out of the gaping hole in the side of the Boeing aircraft while making the trades, this proves that the information was in fact public and their beneficiaries should not face any legal contest to the profits from the trades as long as the trades were executed prior to the moment of impact. I am also not a lawyer.