3 ms·
There would have to be a canonical source of truth (with private key). Then one could be reasonably sure an update is blessed by the owner. Makes me think of no
by hackernudes 3y ago
There would have to be a canonical source of truth (with private key). Then one could be reasonably sure an update is blessed by the owner. Makes me think of nostr + git + torrent/ipfs.
- palata 3y agoOh right. Not everyone modifies the torrent, then, just the maintainer. So as a user I get the magnet link, download (clone) the repo over torrent, then I can send a patch to the maintainer over email, discuss it there (maybe on a mailing list), and when the maintainer merges it, they can update the torrent and propagate the new state of the history. Is that about right? It actually sounds cool :-). I guess the next issue I see is that torrents are not mutable (I think there are some specs maybe, but it's not common/implemented? Not sure).