3 ms·
I found the mistake obvious, but I have some experience with Python. The use of the `for ... in [...]` to destructure the list is quite clever. I would have s
by bombela 3y ago
I found the mistake obvious, but I have some experience with Python.
The use of the `for ... in [...]` to destructure the list is quite clever.
I would have simply indexed the list.
- jotaass 3y agoI don't think it's clever, it's quite unintuitive and ugly. To me anyway. If the author really wanted to cram everything into a list comprehension, the logical way to think about it is: ( (int(tsc, 16), int(pc, 16)) for tsc, _, pc, *_ in (line.strip().split(",") for line in fp) ), Which is, of course, almost as ugly. Just use a for loop and yield
- bombela 3y agoRight, I should have said clever code golf. I think I would have written it like that: def parse(line): p = line.split(",") return ((int(p[0], 16), int(p[2], 16)) (parse(line)) for line in fp) And when it was still cool: map(parse, fp)