3 ms·
It's unclear from the article whither you are correct or you are offering a straw-man argument. Obviously the situation you are positing 1. You posit a distort
by gridspy 3y ago
It's unclear from the article whither you are correct or you are offering a straw-man argument. Obviously the situation you are positing
1. You posit a distorted idea of "tyranny" - you extend it to all morals
2. You assume a second stage of Satan Worship, which might not be present.
From the article it seems far more likely to be an Atheist club that chose a name to cause debate about the cultural capital religion has.
Bear in mind that for centuries the church has been used as a means of control and to support autocrats and persecution. It's far more likely the Satanic club is objecting to that use.
- bryanlarsen 3y agoAs an atheist club they wouldn't have the same constitutional protections that a religious club would have.
- akomtu 3y agoI don't assume. I believe everyone must be given a chance to make an informed choice, so every time those preachers of the left hand try to fool the naive folk, I feel it's my duty to give them a more complete picture. And if they still choose to jump off a cliff, then well, it's their right.