The headline doesn’t say much and the text doesn’t say much more. It could be that such debtors are the majority solely because the number of uninsured has drop

The headline doesn’t say much and the text doesn’t say much more. It could be that such debtors are the majority solely because the number of uninsured has dropped. For instance, if in 2000 there were 2000 debtors with 100 of them being insured, and in 2020 there are 200 debtors with 150 of them being insured, this headline would be true. Which would be ok if the story shed light on this, but it doesn’t.