3 ms·
From your description it sounds like you are redistributing the content: The site will extract the contents from these links as a rss feed. User could subscr
by lacker 18y ago
From your description it sounds like you are redistributing the content:
The site will extract the contents from these links as a rss feed. User could subscribe to this feed in their mobile news reader.
Having your website turn another person's website into an rss feed is redistributing the content.
- alexdong 18y agoI see what you mean. Thanks, lacker.
- thomaspaine 18y agoIsn't this exactly what dapper.net does? I've used it myself to create feeds for websites that are stuck in 1996 and haven't moved on to RSS yet.
- lacker 18y agoI'm not very familiar with dapper.net, but it seems to be saying that content owners can use dapper to distribute their content, rather than allowing random people to strip ads out of anything. For example when I search for [colbert] on dapper.net it has little icons saying permission of the copyright owner is needed.