4 ms·

They're just trying to compete with Intel Extreme Graphics from 2002. Must be they're reaching performance parity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_

They're just trying to compete with Intel Extreme Graphics from 2002. Must be they're reaching performance parity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_graphics_processing_units https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_graphics_process...

seabrookmx 3y ago
Parity? AMD integrated GPU's have outperformed Intel's for many years.
- dathinab 3y ago
  only APU like the 5700G, 8700G or the recent Steam Deck APU (in reasonable comparison targets) The integrated GPUs of the 7000 serious (not APUs) are maximal minimalist to a point I think they couldn't have shrunken them more without running into unusual issues (assuming not changing the architecture/design). They are only suited for web browsing, office use-cases and debugging (but also kinda where made only for that use-case). Well I guess Dead Cells and similar "low requirement/high optimized" games still run nicely on it on 1080p. Still nice to have them if you only have such use-cases saves a ton of money.
  - seabrookmx 3y ago
    APU is a marketing term. The GPU's in them are still integrated GPU's. Intel didn't have anything that held a candle to them until the Iris branded parts, and even those lagged behind. > integrated GPUs of the 7000 serious (not APUs) are maximal minimalist to a point I think they couldn't have shrunken them more Right, because these are meant as a backup display output in parts that are aimed at the gaming market, where they will almost always be paired with a GPU. Comparable parts in prior Ryzen generations didn't even have an iGPU. Intel offers you the choice (no GPU in the "K" SKU) which is nice.
    - dathinab 3y ago
      > APU is a marketing term. sure, the point is that not all integrated graphics are better, only such which try to do so, which happens to be marketed as APUs

4 ms·

They're just trying to compete with Intel Extreme Graphics from 2002. Must be they're reaching performance parity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_

by bonton89 3y ago

seabrookmx 3y ago
Parity? AMD integrated GPU's have outperformed Intel's for many years.
- dathinab 3y ago
  only APU like the 5700G, 8700G or the recent Steam Deck APU (in reasonable comparison targets) The integrated GPUs of the 7000 serious (not APUs) are maximal minimalist to a point I think they couldn't have shrunken them more without running into unusual issues (assuming not changing the architecture/design). They are only suited for web browsing, office use-cases and debugging (but also kinda where made only for that use-case). Well I guess Dead Cells and similar "low requirement/high optimized" games still run nicely on it on 1080p. Still nice to have them if you only have such use-cases saves a ton of money.
  - seabrookmx 3y ago
    APU is a marketing term. The GPU's in them are still integrated GPU's. Intel didn't have anything that held a candle to them until the Iris branded parts, and even those lagged behind. > integrated GPUs of the 7000 serious (not APUs) are maximal minimalist to a point I think they couldn't have shrunken them more Right, because these are meant as a backup display output in parts that are aimed at the gaming market, where they will almost always be paired with a GPU. Comparable parts in prior Ryzen generations didn't even have an iGPU. Intel offers you the choice (no GPU in the "K" SKU) which is nice.
    - dathinab 3y ago
      > APU is a marketing term. sure, the point is that not all integrated graphics are better, only such which try to do so, which happens to be marketed as APUs