4 ms·
IANAL But I'd say, being 'inside a Boeing' is not, legally speaking, the same as being 'inside Boeing'. Saying that, I don't remember hearing the stewardess du
by another2another 3y ago
IANAL But I'd say, being 'inside a Boeing' is not, legally speaking, the same as being 'inside Boeing'.
Saying that, I don't remember hearing the stewardess during the safety briefing say
"In the unlikely event of a crash, make sure to get them shorts in quick!"
Probably because I usually fly on Airbus.
- peddling-brink 3y ago> 'inside a Boeing' is not, legally speaking, the same as being 'inside Boeing'. Due to mens rea, it’s treated the same. However, if the subject can stick their arm out of the gaping hole in the side of the Boeing aircraft while making the trades, this proves that the information was in fact public and their beneficiaries should not face any legal contest to the profits from the trades as long as the trades were executed prior to the moment of impact. I am also not a lawyer.