4 ms·

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/12/21/al-shifa-hospital-gaza-hamas-israel/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/12/21/al-shifa-hos... > The bare

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/12/21/al-shifa-hospital-gaza-hamas-israel/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/12/21/al-shifa-hos... > The bare, white-tiled rooms showed no immediate evidence of use — for command and control or otherwise. There are no signs of recent habitation, including litter, food containers, clothing or other personal items. > “This room was evacuated, and all the gear was evacuated. I guess it was evacuated when they knew or understand that we were going to enter Shifa Hospital,” Hagari said in the video.

tome 3y ago
Al Shifa hospital has not been destroyed, nor has any hospital in Gaza, as far as I am aware.
- johnnyworker 3y ago
  As far as you're aware. Okay? What am I supposed to do with that? 2 seconds of googling yielded this: > According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, 26 out of the 35 hospitals across Gaza are non-functional because of damage sustained during the Israeli military assault or the lack of power.
  - beeboop 3y ago
    Israel isn't in Gaza at all. They're just on the borders playing with puppies. Hey, look over here. Puppies.
  - tome 3y ago
    No one's provided evidence for the "destroyed hospital" that jcranmer claimed a "coterie of journalists" were invited to.
    - johnnyworker 3y ago
      Then replace "destroyed" by "conducted a raid in", or even leave it out altogether, and nothing about the point of that sentence changes.
      - tome 3y ago
        Interesting. To me there's a very strong difference between destroying and not destroying a hospital.
        johnnyworker 3y ago
        Nope, the meaning is the exact same. > I'm not going to try to enumerate Israel's mistakes, but when you decide to invite a coterie of journalists to the hospital you damaged to provide proof of your claims that it was actually a hive center of terrorist activity, and all of them come away basically saying "this evidence isn't good enough," then that should be a sign that it's not PR that's the problem of Israel, it's Israeli actions that are the problem that needs addressing.
        tome 3y ago
        Interesting! I'd definitely prefer that my hospital wasn't destroyed, just damaged. I guess others must feel differently.

tome 3y ago

Al Shifa hospital has not been destroyed, nor has any hospital in Gaza, as far as I am aware.

johnnyworker 3y ago
As far as you're aware. Okay? What am I supposed to do with that? 2 seconds of googling yielded this: > According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, 26 out of the 35 hospitals across Gaza are non-functional because of damage sustained during the Israeli military assault or the lack of power.
- beeboop 3y ago
  Israel isn't in Gaza at all. They're just on the borders playing with puppies. Hey, look over here. Puppies.
- tome 3y ago
  No one's provided evidence for the "destroyed hospital" that jcranmer claimed a "coterie of journalists" were invited to.
  - johnnyworker 3y ago
    Then replace "destroyed" by "conducted a raid in", or even leave it out altogether, and nothing about the point of that sentence changes.
    - tome 3y ago
      Interesting. To me there's a very strong difference between destroying and not destroying a hospital.
      - johnnyworker 3y ago
        Nope, the meaning is the exact same. > I'm not going to try to enumerate Israel's mistakes, but when you decide to invite a coterie of journalists to the hospital you damaged to provide proof of your claims that it was actually a hive center of terrorist activity, and all of them come away basically saying "this evidence isn't good enough," then that should be a sign that it's not PR that's the problem of Israel, it's Israeli actions that are the problem that needs addressing.
        tome 3y ago
        Interesting! I'd definitely prefer that my hospital wasn't destroyed, just damaged. I guess others must feel differently.