12 ms·
I don't want to take sides here. That is not an obvious statement. To one side, that is obvious. To the other, that sounds the same as "murder should be consi
by pests 3y ago
I don't want to take sides here.
That is not an obvious statement. To one side, that is obvious.
To the other, that sounds the same as "murder should be considered a personal decision."
- bee_rider 3y agoYou have already taken a side by comparing Row vs Wade to prohibition. If you don’t want to take a side… don’t present arguments for that side.
- pests 3y agoI didn't compare Row v Wade to prohibition. I brought up Roe v Wade as an example of the courts changing their mind, completely unrelated to Row v Wade. You must have made that association.
- bee_rider 3y agoI must have misread the “too” in > Eh, we got prohibition wrong too. Good learning opportunity as if you were saying we got both of those things wrong.