4 ms·
There are many other reasons people pirate, it's not all about convenience and cost. Personally I would never pay a cent to Disney again, because I do not like
by trompetenaccoun 3y ago
There are many other reasons people pirate, it's not all about convenience and cost. Personally I would never pay a cent to Disney again, because I do not like them and do not want to support their business. A lot of people would not pirate anything if they could pay the creators directly, without the questionable middlemen.
The good news is that many of the problems can be solved with a single solution. Bring back pay-to-own, make it convenient by having marketplaces where you simply pick and payments are done automatically in the background. Give artists and creators the ability to self-publish on the platforms. That in turn will bring down the cost, because now the money goes directly to them.
What's that you say, a team of hundreds of people has worked on a movie? That can all be baked into the token if payments are handled by a smart contract and they can each get their exact percentage with each sale.
Seems a lot fairer for everyone involved. It will also increase quality again, or at least give a boost to productions people want to see. The issue with the current model is that viewers are not directly voting with the wallets anymore, the studios do it for them. That will not stand, there is a growing disconnect between what these corporations produce and what people actually want to see. You can hear people complain all over about how the quality of movies and TV shows is declining. The subscription model is flawed, sooner or later it will die.
- cocacola1 3y agoStudios like money and will produce what makes money. When that changes, they’ll slowly adapt. Slowly being the key word. People love their blockbusters, though, so that’s less likely to change.
- Grimblewald 3y agoanother thing likely driving piracy is the unprecedented economic pressure felt world wide at the moment.
- monstertank 3y agoPersonally it's the unmitigated loads of unwanted ideology jammed down my throat by each platform...I'm just over it. Piracy is so much more reliable.
- lazyeye 3y agoAgreed. It just feels icky giving money to a company like Disney.
- infamouscow 3y agoIt's pretty disgusting Disney supports the school shooter flag.
- bzzzt 3y agoWhy do you pirate content you don't want? And if you're pirating content you do want you're just informing studios there's no money to be made with it so they certainly won't make more of it.
- washadjeffmad 3y agoIt's the disingenuous corporate stances, not the content, that are so contemptible. Especially when they adopt them to wield like orthodoxy to isolate and disenfranchise, not uplift, it's clear that they did it for power, not for ethical or equity reasons. Like the NPR member station that wrongfully fired the disabled Muslim last year. One of his jokes, "Kind of Racist": “I work at one of these places that’s so woke it’s kinda racist,” the joke reads in part. “Like this lady asked my boss, she’s like ‘Yo, does Jad consider himself a person of color?’ because she was making a list of us. Fucking hell? Sick, alright. I get to be in this lady’s brown dude Pokédex.” This joke was called “a powerful condemnation, in a funny way, of what [Sleiman] calls corporatized racial consciousness that makes him, a person of color, feel uncomfortable because he would prefer to be categorized as a whole person regardless of the color of his skin.” He makes another point about not being given the choice of being "white" after 9/11. And now, there's this weird mixed dance somewhere between "we can't depict Koreans as fruit sellers in school books" and "who do we need to enforce labeling on right now to make marketing more valuable over the next 30 years?". NPR seems to want to maintain a moral high ground, and they think this is what sets them apart from their perceived ideological opposition - manufacturing both the demographic and their brand loyalty. Inclusive by name, exclusive by practice.
- cqqxo4zV46cp 3y agolol. I scrolled to find “smart contact” and found it. This is completely unrealistic, utopian thinking. I’ll risk the egg on my face when indie Iron Man 4 comes out.
- trompetenaccoun 3y agoWhat's wrong with indie content? The web first enabled a big boom in that field and it's taken a lot of attention from traditional media. Much of Youtube is basically "indie" media and some of the content is extremely popular. Social media is indie news, if you will. Some consumers do want Disney, Universal & co to feed them the 40th iteration of some lame meme, granted. I'm not saying there won't be a market for Fast and Furious 27. But dismissing everything that isn't a big budget Hollywood production is a bit much. We will see what the future brings but many people expect us to move towards more individual solutions, that's been the trend for decades.
- em-bee 3y agomaking a movie requires upfront investment. either through crowdfunding or through dedicated investors like those studios. so i see no way to completely eliminate the middlemen, because they will want to recoup their investment. we could argue that everyone should get a share of the profits, but with that argument comes the downside of everyone also needing to take a cut when a film makes a loss. i am not sure if i wouldn't prefer just get paid a fair salary for the work and let someone else take that risk.