5 ms·

You can create counterpoint arguments with ChatGPT... Sht in / Sht out. Everybody happy. Years back during big outsourcing project, this never ending conversa

You can create counterpoint arguments with ChatGPT... Sht in / Sht out. Everybody happy. Years back during big outsourcing project, this never ending conversation (between human teams) were big part of it.

bongodongobob 3y ago
I'd say tell them to ask GPT why it won't work. It'll say something like "You're right, I've made a mistake...". This should illustrate that it can be helpful, but it's just aiming to please whether or not the solution is workable or sane.
- Paul-Craft 3y ago
  Indeed, ChatGPT will frequently backpedal if you even slightly hint that its answer may have been wrong: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.13160.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.13160.pdf I have found that you can reduce that behavior if you prompt it correctly, though.
- stordoff 3y ago
  Just asking "Does that work?" can demonstrate this. Slightly contrived example (I've trimmed the ChatGPT output down - it gives some warnings about code readability and that it only has knowledge up to 2022 that might be useful if the code worked at all): > User: how can I pass two parameters to a hugo partial as positional parameters (without using a dict)? > ChatGPT: If you want to pass parameters as positional arguments without using a dictionary, you might need to work around this limitation. One approach is to use a custom data structure, such as a slice or an array, to emulate positional parameters. Here's an example: {{/* In your main template */}} {{ partial "yourPartial.html" "value1" "value2" }} {{/* In yourPartial.html */}} {{ $param1 := index . 0 }} {{ $param2 := index . 1 }} [ChatGPT has also suggested in other runs that the values can be accessed with {{ .Param1 }} and {{ .Param2 }}] > User: Does that work? > ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion in my previous response. I made an error in the example provided. Hugo's templating system doesn't support passing parameters as positional arguments directly, and my previous example was incorrect.
  - otabdeveloper4 3y ago
    Have you tried asking it if it works when it gives a correct response? :)
- krainboltgreene 3y ago
  Is this really your suggestion to someone dealing with a coworker making your work harder to do by gumming up the works with a bad tool? This is cult like behavior.
  - alpaca128 3y ago
    If the coworkers are convinced ChatGPT is a solid source of truth, showing them that ChatGPT will prove their generated answer wrong sounds more effective and time efficient to me than handwriting a refutal that they won't trust as much as GPT.
  - bongodongobob 3y ago
    I don't see the problem. What's the issue? What is cult like about this?
verve_rat 3y ago
You can type shit here. It's ok, we all know what you meant anyway.
AnimalMuppet 3y ago
Or you can ask ChatGPT for the most insulting comment it can come up with. When they get upset, tell them ChatGPT generated it. Look surprised, like you just had the idea, and say that maybe ChatGPT-generated content in emails isn't actually a good idea.

bongodongobob 3y ago

I'd say tell them to ask GPT why it won't work. It'll say something like "You're right, I've made a mistake...". This should illustrate that it can be helpful, but it's just aiming to please whether or not the solution is workable or sane.

Paul-Craft 3y ago
Indeed, ChatGPT will frequently backpedal if you even slightly hint that its answer may have been wrong: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.13160.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.13160.pdf I have found that you can reduce that behavior if you prompt it correctly, though.
stordoff 3y ago
Just asking "Does that work?" can demonstrate this. Slightly contrived example (I've trimmed the ChatGPT output down - it gives some warnings about code readability and that it only has knowledge up to 2022 that might be useful if the code worked at all): > User: how can I pass two parameters to a hugo partial as positional parameters (without using a dict)? > ChatGPT: If you want to pass parameters as positional arguments without using a dictionary, you might need to work around this limitation. One approach is to use a custom data structure, such as a slice or an array, to emulate positional parameters. Here's an example: {{/* In your main template */}} {{ partial "yourPartial.html" "value1" "value2" }} {{/* In yourPartial.html */}} {{ $param1 := index . 0 }} {{ $param2 := index . 1 }} [ChatGPT has also suggested in other runs that the values can be accessed with {{ .Param1 }} and {{ .Param2 }}] > User: Does that work? > ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion in my previous response. I made an error in the example provided. Hugo's templating system doesn't support passing parameters as positional arguments directly, and my previous example was incorrect.
- otabdeveloper4 3y ago
  Have you tried asking it if it works when it gives a correct response? :)
krainboltgreene 3y ago
Is this really your suggestion to someone dealing with a coworker making your work harder to do by gumming up the works with a bad tool? This is cult like behavior.
- alpaca128 3y ago
  If the coworkers are convinced ChatGPT is a solid source of truth, showing them that ChatGPT will prove their generated answer wrong sounds more effective and time efficient to me than handwriting a refutal that they won't trust as much as GPT.
- bongodongobob 3y ago
  I don't see the problem. What's the issue? What is cult like about this?

verve_rat 3y ago

You can type shit here. It's ok, we all know what you meant anyway.

AnimalMuppet 3y ago

Or you can ask ChatGPT for the most insulting comment it can come up with. When they get upset, tell them ChatGPT generated it. Look surprised, like you just had the idea, and say that maybe ChatGPT-generated content in emails isn't actually a good idea.