2 ms·
That's what seemed to be the most likely intended meaning, but the comma throws it off.
by wtallis 3y ago
That's what seemed to be the most likely intended meaning, but the comma throws it off.
- j33zusjuice 3y agoNo it doesn’t. The comment’s syntax is correct. Commas before “which,” and not before “that.” https://www.dictionary.com/e/that-vs-which/# https://www.dictionary.com/e/that-vs-which/# The actual problem is the usage of “which.” If they’re Blueair purifiers that happen to not have HEPA filters, they should have made the clause essential/restrictive. If all Blueair filters lack a HEPA filter, then adding that they don’t have HEPA filters as clarification is non-essential. So I understand your confusion, it’s just not for the reason you said it was.