4 ms·
The idea that "only HEPA-rated filters are acceptable" is bonkers and also internally inconsistent. Two of their "also great" recommendations are Blueair purif
by jerlam 3y ago
The idea that "only HEPA-rated filters are acceptable" is bonkers and also internally inconsistent.
Two of their "also great" recommendations are Blueair purifiers, which do not have HEPA-rated filters.
- wtallis 3y agoDid you mean to imply that Blueair filters as a rule don't have HEPA-rated filters?
- stavros 3y agoI read the sentence as "their two specific Blueair recommendations don't have HEPA-rated filters".
- wtallis 3y agoThat's what seemed to be the most likely intended meaning, but the comma throws it off.
- j33zusjuice 3y agoNo it doesn’t. The comment’s syntax is correct. Commas before “which,” and not before “that.” https://www.dictionary.com/e/that-vs-which/# https://www.dictionary.com/e/that-vs-which/# The actual problem is the usage of “which.” If they’re Blueair purifiers that happen to not have HEPA filters, they should have made the clause essential/restrictive. If all Blueair filters lack a HEPA filter, then adding that they don’t have HEPA filters as clarification is non-essential. So I understand your confusion, it’s just not for the reason you said it was.