4 ms·

Exactly. The same FUD was being spread around a while back regarding google's terms as related to photo sharing on G+. Google needs these rights to provide cert

• excuse-me 14y ago
  Was it Facebook that used someone's photo of themselves in an advert - claiming that it fell under "we can use your images for any purpose" ?
  • rjsamson 14y ago
    That sounds about right. I'm not intimately familiar with FB's terms of use - I'm not sure if there is some differentiation between how they can use your other content and how they can use your profile / profile photo, etc. I haven't heard of Google doing anything like that though, but then their advertising model is a bit different.
  • nbm 14y ago
    I suspect you are misremembering either a real story about an advertiser using someone's photo without permission or rumours based on it that occasionally become popular. An advertiser once, against the FB terms of service, used a user's profile picture in their advertising. The advertiser was banned from the platform. Here's a news story that might jog your memory on this: http://mashable.com/2009/07/17/facebook-dating-ads-2/ http://mashable.com/2009/07/17/facebook-dating-ads-2/
    • rjsamson 14y ago
      Looks like you're absolutely correct - there's FB blog post from a while back talking about how this is something that they will not do: http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=110636457130 http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=110636457130