Thanks for the context! I found the article a bit puzzling as it made the researchers seem almost panicked about the neuroethical part. This was either: (1) a

Thanks for the context! I found the article a bit puzzling as it made the researchers seem almost panicked about the neuroethical part. This was either: (1) a journalistic technique (2) the capabilities are progressing far faster here than I have seen, and the article didn't really do a good job of going into it. I would like it to be based on real progress, but I don't think the article really described the recent progress well.