3 ms·
The archive of that site has many posts answering your question. Some have been on HN in the past months. Archive https://www.afterbabel.com/archive https://ww
by pmontra 3y ago
The archive of that site has many posts answering your question. Some have been on HN in the past months.
Archive https://www.afterbabel.com/archive https://www.afterbabel.com/archive
Here are 13 Other Explanations for the Adolescent Mental Health Crisis. None of Them Work.
https://www.afterbabel.com/p/13-explanations-mental-health-crisis https://www.afterbabel.com/p/13-explanations-mental-health-c...
- WarOnPrivacy 3y ago> Here are 13 Other Explanations for the Adolescent Mental Health Crisis. She finally gets to the deciding modern condition - the one where kids are systemically denied critical growth time (daily blocks of adult-free time & safe places to roam [safe=no threat of police or other compulsive adults]). And even tho she has this on her list of false suppositions she admits probably isn't as false as she infers. But she then immediately minimizes this historic erasure of development by saying it's just 'independence' kids have lost. Gaslighting done, she bizarrely accuses devices & social media of causing it, even tho it was obvious by the 1980s that options for free-roaming and adult-free time were well on the way to being eradicated. Perhaps being so invested in pregurgitated conclusions, she's unable to notice super-obvious competing factors.
- granshaw 3y agoBingo, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38937293 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38937293
- watwut 3y agoThe article is about mental health crisis being international. Meanwhile, German, French, Swiss, Japan or Scandinavian kids walk around towns free without adults. They walk to school at age of 6 or even sooner. If it was just about independence, countries like Germany or France would not had the issue.
- naasking 3y agoExactly. Everybody just immediately jumps to their pet theory without actually digesting the full set of data that needs to be explained. The article very clearly lays out why those other explanations are less plausible than social media, and the cross-cultural nature of it is a big point. All that said, the authors who publish on that site are also very pro-unsupervised free play and think its decline has caused mental health issues of its own (see Haidt's The Coddling of the American Mind).
- pixl97 3y agoPeople are really bad about interpreting complex multifactor causations, it seems in every discipline. I think human social systems have a lot of 'anti-fragile' built into them. That is any one factor, unless it is insanely serious, isn't going to cause a mass collapse of society. We adapt and smooth things over. This is something we see in ecological systems all the time. The problems start cropping up when multiple stressors are introduced to the environment. For example, I'd say the disappearance of 'third places' forces more youth to social media thereby increasing said harm of social media. Also, social media likely needs broken into a series of different factors on what is harmful about it. You have the direct "Kids going things to kids", but neglecting what social media is doing to their parents would be missing the forest for the trees. The 24 hour news cycle tapped into the fear sells, and online has taken it to 'fear gets eyeballs'. Add in advertisers being unscrupulous, and countless bots attempting to manipulate you, it's no wonder we're not all insane.