3 ms·
Agree. I think every camera manufacturer should implement auto blur on photos (legislate it). Then an opt-in system unblurs the faces of the people that approv
by chris-orgmenta 3y ago
Agree.
I think every camera manufacturer should implement auto blur on photos (legislate it).
Then an opt-in system unblurs the faces of the people that approve.
(Or just replace the faces with AI random faces instead of blur)
Point being, society has fallen into an opt-out system naturally - But I don't think there is good reason for it to be a necessary thing for the common good. I want privacy, and the tech is there to do it.
Manufacturers are meddling with raw images for proof of non-tampering, and if the horse has bolted there then I want my proposal above folded in at the same level.
- iraqmtpizza 3y agojust wear a mask instead of going house to house confiscating cameras with SWAT teams
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- vsnf 3y agofwiw, some facial recognition systems, especially ones coming out of Asia where masks are far more common, are pretty good at identifying people with masks on.
- Vecr 3y agoAn elastomeric respirator worn with a hood (on the outside, don't break the seal) and dark sunglasses might work well enough in the US. Need to do something about gait though.