3 ms·
That’s because this post wasn’t written with the help of LLMs: > the post you are reading is not just written by myself, but as the tradition in this blog dema
by faitswulff 3y ago
That’s because this post wasn’t written with the help of LLMs:
> the post you are reading is not just written by myself, but as the tradition in this blog demands, not even re-read or corrected if not for a quick second pass. This way you can see what my written English really is, and if you are curious, compare it with the post about LLMs. The difference is not less than huge.
The post on LLMs reads quite a bit more fluently in English: http://antirez.com/news/140 http://antirez.com/news/140
- naet 3y agoAh my mistake, I read that but thought that "not just written by myself" meant it was written by him with the LLM. I see now that this was not LLM augmented, it was the other post that was. I do see some grammar errors still in the opening paragraphs of the LLM translated post on first look though... For example: "Countless hours spent searching for documentation on peculiar, intellectually uninteresting aspects; the efforts to learn an overly complicated API, often without good reason; writing immediately usable programs that I would discard after a few hours."
- abecedarius 3y agoThat's maybe a bit informal in that it's not a sentence. But I wouldn't call it ungrammatical except from a prescriptive-grammarian viewpoint -- I read a lot and I wouldn't notice it in context.